The incident that occurred at Virginia Polytechnic is a horrific tragedy. It saddens me, but it also fills me with outrage.
Predictably, there will be the typical American, knee jerk reaction aftermath. There will be a public outcry, demanding universities increase campus security to the extreme of turning them into mini-fortresses, adding to already astronomical tuition costs. More jails and more people with badges and guns; it’s always our first course of action.
Universities have come a long way in improving security measures in the last 25 years. Most campuses provide night escorts for female students, safety rides and safety education. Schools are simply not equipped to handle the kind of occurrence that happened this week nor should they be (unless, of course, they have a satellite campus in Baghdad). VPI and local police did a commendable job given the circumstances. The VPI shootings are an anomaly.
We live in a violent society. College campuses are a microcosm of the larger world. A mirroring takes place between the two. We like to believe our university system is the Emerald City of our best and brightest young minds (actually, there usually is an old white man behind a curtain pulling levers and blowing smoke). One need only log onto My Space and read some of the typical collegiate profiles to be dispelled of this notion. Furthermore, Ted Kaczynski is a Harvard grad; incredibly intelligent, but nutty as they come.
There is at least one Cho Seung-Hui on every campus. They may never act on their rage and homicidal fantasies, but they’re out there. We want to know “Why would he do something like this? What was his motive? Who is to blame?”
I guarantee that within a week, every talk show will have their favorite-mental-health-worker-for-hire on the air, examining Cho’s psychological profile. They will offer such chestnuts as “he was abused, molested, tortured, an object of childhood peer ridicule” and “let this be a cautionary tale.” I can already hear Dr. Phil and his replacement, Dr. Robin, now.
These scenarios may very well be true, but they’re not “the answer.” Many individuals suffer similar experiences and others far worse, yet they don’t grow up to kill 32 people and themselves. Hui was a highly disturbed young man who slipped through the cracks before arriving to that elusive critical moment in which he might have reached out for help.
There is always a “moment.” It’s not a matter of providing support services. Many students don’t seek help unless a third party intervenes in the right way and at the right time. It could be a seemingly insignificant comment or event. The most troubled students all have a similar story. A person (coach, adviser, RA, professor, peer) somehow demonstrates that they care in a way the student can hear and feel and then they seek help. Generally, these are spontaneous, unplanned, random occurrences that cannot be forced or done as part of academic advising protocol.
Who is to blame? The police? The university? Violent video games? WE are to blame and the politicians we elect who legislate the sale of firearms are to blame. Period. Dennis Miller, a comedian I used to like, once said, “Folks, you can’t save everyone. Just pray you’re not living next door to them when they decide to go off.” He’s right.
There will always be dangerous, psychotic people in the world. We can’t control that. However, we can control the ease of access and sale of firearms. Hui was able to walk into a gun shop and, because of his resident visa, wasn’t subject to a waiting period. Native US residents can purchase weapons if they have a valid driver’s license and no criminal record. The “no criminal record” caveat always makes me snort derisively- like a criminal doesn’t know how to purchase a gun without going through the proper channels. Give me a break.
Many will argue it’s our constitutional right to bear arms. Fact: The constitution was drafted at a time when you could be mauled to death by a bear on your way to the outhouse and the general consensus was that bathing regularly could make you sick and eventually die. “The right to bear arms” is no longer a valid or viable argument. Enough already.
I wonder if any of the parents whose children were murdered or whose children witnessed and were traumatized by the murders have NRA bumper stickers on their SUV’s? I wonder how they will be able to continue to defend the sale of guns? I’m certain many of them will.
It is our elected officials responsibility to stand up to their corporate backers and the small, but loud number of constituents who oppose stricter gun laws. A 4-year old child would eat his body weight in sugar if his parents allowed him to do so. The people in charge need to be responsible, even when many citizens demand they act irresponsibly.
We can’t save everyone, but as a society we can call for legislature that makes it more difficult if not impossible to purchase these weapons. If we’re serious about making campuses, not to mention society, safer, this would be a good start.
Written by: Dr. Tara J. Palmatier, Psy.D.